Light is what enables us to see, without which the world around us is a void of visual nothingness. As a Photographer, light is what I am in constant search of, in order to best highlight that which I would like to photograph. 'Good' light. A complimentary light, to facilitate a good photographic creation. But what really constitutes, 'good' light?
I believe that 'good' light, is light that enables you to creatively produce an image how YOU would like it to be seen. 'Good' light is subjective. Just as 'good photography', is subjective :P And although many would agree that a cloudy dull day would produce 'bad' light, I would argue that it all depends on what it is that you'd like to photograph!You see, light also conveys an emotion. Bright shiny light generally carries with it joy, positivity and all things good. Whereas dull boring light, would set a more sombre mood. For example, you can photograph an apple, in the same location twice, using two contrasting lighting situations, and you will
produce two completely different images. Each photograph would evoke an emotional reaction through your visual senses. Your eyes. Your eyes would see both images differently. Both images would 'feel' differently, appealing to different emotions, because that's how the brain responds to light.
Knowing this, it allows photography to be emotionally creative through the use of light. And also, in the absence of it. Sometimes it's what is omitted through the absence of light in a photograph, that really makes the image shine. Using this absence of light, or 'shadow' rather, life can be given to an image - whereas if it had've been completely lit, it most probably would not have. It would be a different photograph altogether. Losing the impact, and missing the point. The converse is also true. Using too much shadow can totally destroy an image.
So when is less, more? When is it more effective to use a greater percentage of shadow, and a lesser percentage of light in an image, to create a fabulous result? Well, remember! Photography is subjective! Just because a new bride is joyous, and celebratory, doesn't mean that she cannot be captured in a dark and moody image. The absence of light evokes many emotions. The photograph would then adopt a very dramatic feel - a contrast to how we would expect to see a bride. Just because it's different, does it necessarily make it wrong?
My photography, and it's interplay with light is very fluid. I have found that my emotional state directly influences my photography. My mood is very often reflected in how I choose to take a photograph, because the way that I feel, directly affects the way in which I see light.Photography I feel, is subjective for this reason. It's the reason why two people can disagree upon the same photograph. And why some Photographers only ever shoot in one particular style. Light carries with it emotion, and we are creatures who are subjected to all kinds of lighting situations. We joke that the British are always grumpy, and revere the Cariocans for being joyous, but seriously.. Take a look at the lighting conditions that they are indeed subjected to for an extended period of time!




























